- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:37:11 -0700
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr, reply+00ae32b891c30e16cc8664d84846f52cc921a4d8f3f3f65692cf0000000114f1b8d692a16, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
- Cc: author@noreply.github.com
- Message-ID: <a15005ba-6cdb-6f49-8f0e-b4d15ad0b121@ucsb.edu>
I made the same argument on the IRC. On 03/28/2017 01:29 PM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote: > > Not sure it is wise to draw attention to not-yet-implemented ideas, > especially if we don’t explain how it is better. > > A ‘standard’ is stronger if one and only one way to solve each problem > is provided. > > So, while I don’t disagree that it would be possible to follow the > pattern to derive a Forecast class, it seems to be a distraction to > include the extra paragraph here. The document is a ‘recommendation’, > not a discursive paper. > > Simon > > *From:*Maxime Lefrançois [mailto:maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 March, 2017 06:40 > *To:* w3c/sdw > <reply+00ae32b891c30e16cc8664d84846f52cc921a4d8f3f3f65692cf0000000114f1b8d692a16>; > SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > *Cc:* Author <author@noreply.github.com> > *Subject:* Re: ACTION-282: Draft a note on forecasting to address > issue-82. > > Dear all, > > Based on the reviewers comments, I added a new commit to the separate > branch: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/compare/action-282-forecasting . I > did not issue any pull request for this branch. > > The notes I propose now read like: > > One may represent forecasts as observations if the value of > <code>sosa:phenomenonTime</code> is later in time than the > <code>sosa:resultTime</code>. Given the definition of these terms, it > means that: <em>The time when the Observation act was completed is > before the time that the Result of the observation applies to the > FeatureOfInterest.</em> <br/> > > Note however that there are other means to represent forecasts. > For example one could derive the SSN > <em>Sensing/Sensor/Observation</em> pattern and define some > Forecasting/Forecaster/Forecast classes. > > and a second note reads like: > > Describing a plan for some actuation or observation in the future is > not covered by this specification. > > I would like us to base our discussions on this version in agenda > iteam 1 of the call today. > > Best, > > Maxime > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 20:37:47 UTC