W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

RE: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592)

From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:23:54 +0000
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, w3c/sdw <reply+00ae32b82e98c58e2ec26af6e3ada1b78f8f938b73e9fde892cf0000000114d65caf92a16>, w3c/sdw <sdw@noreply.github.com>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SYXPR01MB15365140EB1994F77954F82EA42F0@SYXPR01MB1536.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Antoine -- all resolved happily, and thankyou kindly for your comments to keep us on the straight and narrow!-Kerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Zimmermann [mailto:antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr] 
Sent: Tuesday, 7 March 2017 11:42 PM
To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>; w3c/sdw <reply+00ae32b82e98c58e2ec26af6e3ada1b78f8f938b73e9fde892cf0000000114d65caf92a16>; w3c/sdw <sdw@noreply.github.com>; SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Author <author@noreply.github.com>
Subject: Re: [w3c/sdw] implemented resolution 10 to 13 of call 28-02-17 (#592)

Maxime, others,


On 07/03/2017 13:08, Maxime Lefrançois wrote:
>
> [skip]
 >
>
> As far as I can remember, I always lightened the RDF document that 
> introduce OWL ontologies instances of owl:Restriction. I think my 
> initial decision to do so was motivated by:
>   - the domain of owl:onProperty in https://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# is 
> owl:Restriction

The file that you are linking to says at the top in a literal, among other things:

"the descriptions provided in this ontology *do not provide a complete and correct formal description* of either the syntax or the semantics of the introduced terms (please see the OWL 2 recommendations for the complete and normative specifications). Furthermore, the information provided by this ontology may be misleading if not used with care."

(my emphasis)

This file is of no relevance to anything when discussing things related to OWL. It is meant to help RDF/Linked Data processors that are dealing with OWL terms.


It is good emphasising this every so often because there are every once in a while people referring to this file as a justification for dealing with OWL the way they do.


HTH,
--AZ

Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 23:24:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 7 March 2017 23:24:33 UTC