W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Actions in "final" best practice sprint

From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:45:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CADtUq_3MNxo+gJcfSz=360jmWs7Kx2nYG-Ej6RxsO2ZaU1=ysg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Parslow <Peter.Parslow@os.uk>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Thank you for confirmation Peter. Jeremy

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 at 09:44 Peter Parslow <Peter.Parslow@os.uk> wrote:

> Jeremy,
>
> Yes, I acknowledge those actions. I plan to do the work in the week
> beginning 10th April
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> *From:* Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 30 March 2017 09:22
> *To:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>; Peter Parslow <
> Peter.Parslow@os.uk>; Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
> *Subject:* Actions in "final" best practice sprint
>
>
>
> Hi Peter & Bill
>
>
>
> During yesterday's BP sub-group call, we went through the detailed plan
> for the final sprint of BP work [1].
>
>
>
> Most of the lucky people with actions were on the call to confirm that
> they were content with their understanding of what needed to be done.
>
>
>
> In my attempts to be organised (!) I'm just checking in with you two as
> you have some bits to do...
>
>
>
> Peter:
>
> 1/ "how to test" and "evidence" for BP5 [2]
>
> 2/ review BP5 and fix as necessary [3] ... also note Bruce Bannerman's
> comments about the difference between precision and accuracy [4] and my
> suggestion [5]
>
> 3/ glossary [6]
>
>
>
> Bill:
>
> 1/ "how to test" and "evidence" for BP10 [2]
>
> 2/ continuing work on BP10 [7]
>
> 3/ file formats and vocabularies Appendix [8] (with Andrea)
>
>
>
> (Bill - apologies as you weren't at Day 1 of the F2F, item /3/ might be
> new to you)
>
>
>
> Please confirm that you're content with these work items.
>
>
>
> We've set our date to VOTE for the next release at Wed 26-April ... so
> we'll want to FREEZE the doc a few days before that.
>
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> ---
>
>
>
> [1]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Mid_March_-_end_of_April_2017
> :
>
> [2]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#How_to_test_and_Evidence_.28e.g._cross-ref_with_UCR_Requirements.29_sections_for_each_best_practice
>
>
> [3]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Best_Practice_5:_Describe_the_positional_accuracy_of_spatial_data
>
>
> [4]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Mar/0213.html
>
>
>
> " * First para: "you can express a location to within a few metres”. This
> statement ignores issues of precision and accuracy [1]. You can be as
> precise as you like, but that does not make your data accurate. In relation
> to the quoted text from the first paragraph, a precise coordinate that
> purports to be within a few meters due to it’s coordinate precision may in
> fact be inaccurate and perhaps kilometres away from that location."
>
>
>
> [5]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Mar/0249.html
>
>
>
> "*Precision vs. accuracy*: I think we have an outstanding action to
> clarify our perspective on this … I seem to recall that *Andrea Perego*
> offered to write a few lines. That said, I would encourage feedback on
> *Best Practice 5: Describe the positional accuracy of spatial data* [1] to
> make sure we have our base concepts right. *Peter Parslow* is undertaking a
> review task in this sprint."
>
>
>
> [6]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Glossary
>
>
> [7]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#BP10:_Encoding_spatial_data
>
>
> [8]:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#File_formats_and_vocabularies
>
>
>
> This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may
> contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied,
> distributed or disclosed to any other person.
>
> Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the
> writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor can
> any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve
> the right to monitor emails and attachments without prior notice.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>
> Ordnance Survey Limited (Company Registration number 09121572)
> Registered Office: Explorer House
> Adanac Drive
> Southampton SO16 0AS
> Tel: 03456 050505
> http://www.os.uk
>
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2017 08:45:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 30 March 2017 08:45:48 UTC