- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:49:40 +0000
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Thanks for spotting this Lars! Have fixed it. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Svensson, Lars [mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 14 maart 2017 09:55 Aan: Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org) Onderwerp: RE: [BP] Updates to BP6 Dear Linda, On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:13 AM, Linda van den Brink [mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl] wrote: [...] > The first one illustrates possible approach 2) (providing a series of > immutable snapshots). The example was taken from > gemeentegeschiedenis.nl which publishes historic and current > boundaries of municipalities. However I changed the GeoJSON I got from > there to reflect our recommendation. The original code has all > historic as well as the current boundary in one GeoJSON file. I > changed this to multiple code snippets referring to one another. I asked the developer of gemeentegeschiedenis.nl for a review as well. I think there's a typo in the 2014 version: it says [[ "replacedBy": "http://www.gemeentegeschiedenis.nl/gemeentenaam/Amsterdam/2014", ]] Shouldn't that be [[ "replacedBy": "http://www.gemeentegeschiedenis.nl/gemeentenaam/Amsterdam/2016", ]] ? I. e. the 2014 version is replaced by the 2016 one. Apart from that, +1 from me. Best, Lars
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2017 10:50:13 UTC