W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture

From: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:58:48 +0000
To: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <94EE7899-3381-48B7-A2D8-2ADEC368E007@anu.edu.au>
Thanks indeed Maxime for the new wiki page.

I do object in removing existing votes, since some of these votes are from people who have not been at the meeting yesterday. If they are unable to join again today, at least we have their opinion heard on the wiki.

I personally do agree with the pros/cons that Maxime pointed out, but if you feel they are not reflective of the solutions, we can certainly start by revisiting them in detail in the phone call.

From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Date: Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 10:14 am
To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Remaining Options for SOSA-SSN Integration, Was: SOSA/SSN integration architecture
Resent-From: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, 21 March 2017 at 10:14 am

Thanks Maxime, very helpful

I would strongly suggest we remove existing votes and rationales, and review the pros and cons first and make sure we agree,

For example,

1) for Option 1 the con Armin pointed out was there was no means to discover the stronger axiomitisation of a SOSA term

2) Option 8 is characterised as requireing content-negotiation to discover SOSA+OWL - that is actually the CON for Option 5, Option 8 is a solution which explicitly avoids the con

3) the "Con" reported for Option 8 is that OWL editors may automatically follow owl:imports when the user may not want them to. (Personally that seems like a strange corner case and the user's problem in choice of how to use tool

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 at 00:52 Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr<mailto:maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>> wrote:
Dear all,

This is related to  ISSUE-139 and ISSUE-146

Following the decisions made today at the F2F meeting, I created a wiki page with the three remaining options:


This page contains the description of the three options and describes the main pros and cons of each of them.

Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2017 00:59:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:17:05 UTC