W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

RE: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc

From: <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:11:58 +0000
To: <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
CC: <phila@w3.org>, <fd@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EDFF15E839F79242AA55B1468C63DDA95E436F@S-DC-ESTC02-J.net1.cec.eu.int>
Thanks, Jeremy.

Just a short summary on BP8 (I'll provide the details during the call):

A completed a first revision of BP8, which now include:
- Revision proposals for sections "Why", "Intended Outcome", and "Possible Approach to Implementation".
- Notes
- Examples

You can check it here:

https://andrea-perego.github.io/sdw/bp/index.html#describe-geometry

I kept all the text, whereas the new one is in yellow.

In the revision, I tried as much as possible to take into account the feedback got so far, and re-use the original content. When the original content was not re-used in the running text it has been added in the notes.

Looking forward for your comments!

Andrea

PS: An editorial issue. It would be nice to be able to have a way to crossref example as done for section, without the need of adding "Example 1", etc. In my fork I added a small JavaScript snippet doing the job, but I wonder whether ReSpec supports this feature.

@Phil, @François, can you help here?


----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

________________________________
From: Jeremy Tandy [jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 February 2017 12:42
To: SDW WG Public List
Subject: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc

Hi-

Agenda for tomorrow's call at 16:00utc is here [1]

Main talking points are:

  *   Quick look at the detailed plan for the sprint leading up to Delft F2F backlog and sprint plan<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document>
  *   Decision: are non-geographic CRS out of scope? (see ISSUE 392<https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/392>) ... none of our material covers this topic although we have non-geo use cases
  *   (Andrea<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/User:Aperego>) Review progress on BP8<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#describe-geometry> (geometry serialisation)
  *   (@clemens and @lars) Discussion: refinement of recommendations for use of sitemaps in BP4<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines> (see [https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0242.html email) item (2) and responses
  *   Decision: shall we recommend samePlaceAs property? (see discussion thread<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0532.html>)
  *   Decision: shall we remove BP2 Provide context required to interpret data values<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#provide-context>? (see discussion thread<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0531.html>)

... and if we have time:

  *   Discussion: how to represent bounding boxes (see discussion thread<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Feb/0418.html>)
  *   (@clemens) Review progress on BP11: Expose spatial data through 'convenience APIs'<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis>
  *   Review proposals for CRS materials - §8 CRS Intro<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#CRS-background>, BP3<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#ref-crs> and BP17<http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bp-crs>

Busy!

Regrets already received from Bill.

Speak to you all tomorrow. Cheerio!

Jeremy

[1]: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20170301
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:13:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 1 March 2017 10:14:00 UTC