Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API

+1


On 3/3/2017 8:15 AM, Scott Simmons wrote:
> +1
>
>> On Mar 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu 
>> <mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>> <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu 
>> <mailto:andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> ----
>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
>> European Commission DG JRC
>> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
>> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>>
>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>>
>> ----
>> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
>> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
>> position of the European Commission.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:*Linda van den Brink [l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl 
>> <mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>]
>> *Sent:*03 March 2017 11:13
>> *To:*Ed Parsons; Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List
>> *Subject:*RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include 
>> search capability in your data access API
>>
>> +1
>>
>> *Van:*Ed Parsons [mailto:eparsons@google.com]
>> *Verzonden:*donderdag 2 maart 2017 16:49
>> *Aan:*Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List
>> *Onderwerp:*Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include 
>> search capability in your data access API
>>
>> +1 to help consensus building ?
>>
>> ed
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 at 12:10 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Clemens,
>>
>>     +1 from me to this suggestion.
>>
>>     (with my editor hat on, I'm waiting for working group consensus
>>     to emerge)
>>
>>     Jeremy
>>
>>     On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 18:00 Clemens Portele
>>     <portele@interactive-instruments.de
>>     <mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         in the BP call today [1] we discussed, if BP 12 [2] could or
>>         should be removed.
>>
>>         Currently the BP is almost empty and the topics raised in the
>>         BP are already included in BP 11 [3] regarding spatial
>>         searches (neighbourhood, bounding box) and free text
>>         searches. It feels as if there is not enough content left to
>>         keep a separate BP providing original, actionable guidance.
>>         There is also the old ISSUE-186 [4].
>>
>>         An alternative option could be to move all search related
>>         aspects out of BP 11 and to BP 12.
>>
>>         My proposal would be to keep the API related guidance for
>>         spatial data in a single BP, complementing the general
>>         guidance in the DWBP (DW BPs 23 to 26) [5].
>>
>>         Any thoughts from the group?
>>
>>         Clemens
>>
>>         [1]https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html
>>         [2]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api
>>         [3]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis
>>         [4]https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186
>>         [5]https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
>> Geospatial Technologist,Google
>>
>> Google Voice+44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501>
>> www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com/>@edparsons
>>
>