RE: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the licenses themselves)

Hi, Raúl.

May be worth also having a look here:

http://schema.theodi.org/odrs/


IMHO, dct:license is more than enough if you're using a standard licence, or a licence with a proper HTTP URI. But if you need to add things like copyright statement, attribution text, etc., ODRS addresses some of modelling shortcomings in CC.

My two cents

Andrea

----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Raúl García Castro [mailto:rgarcia@fi.upm.es]
>Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 9:19 AM
>To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
>Subject: Comments on how to represent licenses in ontologies (and on the
>licenses themselves)
>
>Dear all,
>
>I just finished ACTION-274 and updated the wiki with the comments from
>my colleague Víctor Rodríguez Doncel on the representation of licenses
>in the ontologies and on the analysis of both licenses.
>
>https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Ontology_rights_and_licence#Comm

>ents_from_V.C3.ADctor_Rodr.C3.ADguez_Doncel
>
>In short:
>* Using cc:license or dct:license is a common practice and suffices.
>* Both licenses are essentially the same (but the OGC one contains a
>contradiction).
>
>Kind regards,
>
>--
>
>Dr. Raúl García Castro
>http://www.garcia-castro.com/

>
>Ontology Engineering Group
>Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
>Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos
>Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
>Phone: +34 91 336 65 96 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19

Received on Monday, 6 March 2017 09:21:54 UTC