- From: Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 06:15:27 -0700
- To: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
- Cc: l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl, eparsons@google.com, jeremy.tandy@gmail.com, portele@interactive-instruments.de, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E762E99F-698D-4A22-B7FC-156B70892196@opengeospatial.org>
+1 > On Mar 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> wrote: > > +1 > > Andrea > > ---- > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > Scientific / Technical Project Officer > European Commission DG JRC > Directorate B - Growth and Innovation > Unit B6 - Digital Economy > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > > https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ <https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/> > > ---- > The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may > not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official > position of the European Commission. > > From: Linda van den Brink [l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl] > Sent: 03 March 2017 11:13 > To: Ed Parsons; Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List > Subject: RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API > > +1 > > Van: Ed Parsons [mailto:eparsons@google.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 2 maart 2017 16:49 > Aan: Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List > Onderwerp: Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API > > +1 to help consensus building ? > > ed > > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 at 12:10 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com <mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote: > Clemens, > > +1 from me to this suggestion. > > (with my editor hat on, I'm waiting for working group consensus to emerge) > > Jeremy > > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 18:00 Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de <mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote: > Hi all, > > in the BP call today [1] we discussed, if BP 12 [2] could or should be removed. > > Currently the BP is almost empty and the topics raised in the BP are already included in BP 11 [3] regarding spatial searches (neighbourhood, bounding box) and free text searches. It feels as if there is not enough content left to keep a separate BP providing original, actionable guidance. There is also the old ISSUE-186 [4]. > > An alternative option could be to move all search related aspects out of BP 11 and to BP 12. > > My proposal would be to keep the API related guidance for spatial data in a single BP, complementing the general guidance in the DWBP (DW BPs 23 to 26) [5]. > > Any thoughts from the group? > > Clemens > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html <https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html> > [2] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api> > [3] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis> > [4] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186 <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186> > [5] https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs <https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs> > -- > Ed Parsons FRGS > Geospatial Technologist, Google > > Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501> > www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons >
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 13:16:20 UTC