W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API

From: Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 06:15:27 -0700
Message-Id: <E762E99F-698D-4A22-B7FC-156B70892196@opengeospatial.org>
Cc: l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl, eparsons@google.com, jeremy.tandy@gmail.com, portele@interactive-instruments.de, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
To: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
+1

> On Mar 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Andrea
> 
> ----
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
> 
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ <https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/>
> 
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
> 
> From: Linda van den Brink [l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl]
> Sent: 03 March 2017 11:13
> To: Ed Parsons; Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List
> Subject: RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API
> 
> +1
>  
> Van: Ed Parsons [mailto:eparsons@google.com] 
> Verzonden: donderdag 2 maart 2017 16:49
> Aan: Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List
> Onderwerp: Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API
>  
> +1 to help consensus building ?
>  
> ed
>  
>  
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 at 12:10 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com <mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Clemens,
>  
> +1 from me to this suggestion.
>  
> (with my editor hat on, I'm waiting for working group consensus to emerge)
>  
> Jeremy
>  
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 18:00 Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de <mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> in the BP call today [1] we discussed, if BP 12 [2] could or should be removed.
> 
> Currently the BP is almost empty and the topics raised in the BP are already included in BP 11 [3] regarding spatial searches (neighbourhood, bounding box) and free text searches. It feels as if there is not enough content left to keep a separate BP providing original, actionable guidance. There is also the old ISSUE-186 [4].
> 
> An alternative option could be to move all search related aspects out of BP 11 and to BP 12.
> 
> My proposal would be to keep the API related guidance for spatial data in a single BP, complementing the general guidance in the DWBP (DW BPs 23 to 26) [5].
> 
> Any thoughts from the group?
> 
> Clemens
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html <https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html>
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api>
> [3] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis>
> [4] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186 <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186>
> [5] https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs <https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs>
> --
> Ed Parsons FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
> 
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501>
> www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons
> 
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 13:16:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 March 2017 13:16:21 UTC