Re: A blog post and a (good? best?) practice

Hello Linda,

Yes, the dataset is meant to be persistent. But it does not contain data
about the Westerkerk because the dataset published in SPIDER is about
church buildings that were completed between the years 1800 and 1970. The
Westerkerk is much older than that.

Regards,
Frans



On 17 March 2017 at 08:33, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Thanks for the update! In the BP, we are already mentioning the Westerkerk
> in Amsterdam (a church) so we could refer to the SPIDER church dataset.
> Could you find Westerkerk for us?
>
>
>
> Is the dataset going to stay online persistently?
>
>
>
> *Van:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 16 maart 2017 17:03
> *Aan:* SDW WG Public List
> *Onderwerp:* A blog post and a (good? best?) practice
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> Although I have been rather absent lately I would like to share two
> results of recent activity:
>
>
>
> Firstly, the Star Strek themed blog
> <http://www.geodan.com/space-the-final-frontier/> I mentioned a while ago
> was followed up by a blog that is inspired by another popular SF franchise
> <http://www.geodan.com/dont-succumb-dark-side-bring-data-surface/>. The
> new blog is about Spatial Data Infrastructures and data portals and about
> alternative ways to provide universal usefulness for spatial data.
>
>
>
> Secondly, I would like to mention that the website of the SPIDER research
> project <http://www.spider-ld.org/> has gone public.The website,
> available in Dutch and English, is about how Linked Data can aid sharing
> research data in the humanities. A single cultural heritage use case
> involving data about church buildings in the Netherlands was developed.
> Work on trying to decently publish those data has led to recommendations
> that are shared on the web site. Also there are two example applications,
> one with a map.
>
> Apache Marmotta <http://marmotta.apache.org/> is used as the data
> platform. A new version of Marmotta with support for GeoSPARQL was
> announced to be released in the summer of last year. Unfortunately that has
> not happened yet, so certain envisaged spatial functionality is lacking.
>
> I have tried to behave with respect to good practices for publishing
> (spatial) data on the web, so this case could be used as a reference. I
> hope no one spots any bad practices... if so, I should fix it.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>