W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

BP doc is ready for publication

From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:14:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CADtUq_0RB0TmP0GaUBtUUmmk=SQKjbA5eDiLr+5me+dcT_bv6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, fd@w3.org
Phil, François,

the BP document is now ready for you to take it on for publication ...

We editors have done the following:

   - fixed broken <section> elements
   - fixed broken table in Appendix C (requirements cross)
   - updated “sotd”
   - updated “changes”
   - removed references to closed issues: 125 & 208
   - fixed spelling & grammar mistakes - (using American-English!)
   - W3C ReSpec: ok - no warnings, no errors
   - W3C PubRules check [https://www.w3.org/pubrules/]: 2 errors reported
   (“Status of This Document” and “W3C Process boilerplate”); manual
   verification indicates that the necessary rules _are_ being followed …
   -
   -
   Error
   <https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules?profile=WD#sotd>

   <https://github.com/w3c/specberus/issues/new?title=Bug%20in%20rule%20%E2%80%9Cgeneric.sotd%E2%80%9D:%20[WHAT]&body=[EXPLANATION]%0A%0AFound%20[while%20checking%20`http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fsdw%2Fbp%2F`](https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fpubrules%2F).&labels=from-template>
   No *“status of this document”* section found. Some errors related to
   this one will be omitted from the output, but most likely this will cause
   further problems along the line.
   There must be a status section that follows the abstract, labeled with an
    h2 element with content "Status of This Document". The Team maintains
   the status section of a document.
   - Error
   <https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules?profile=WD#whichProcess>

   <https://github.com/w3c/specberus/issues/new?title=Bug%20in%20rule%20%E2%80%9Cmetadata.process%E2%80%9D:%20[WHAT]&body=[EXPLANATION]%0A%0AFound%20[while%20checking%20`http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fsdw%2Fbp%2F`](https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fpubrules%2F).&labels=from-template>
   Missing, or wrong, boilerplate text in the status section to identify
   the governing process.
   The document must include the following boilerplate text in the status
   section to identify the governing process:

   This document is governed by the 1 March 2017 W3C Process Document
   <https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/>.

   Include this source code:
   <p>This document is governed by the <a id="w3c_process_revision" href="
   https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/">1 March 2017 W3C Process
   Document</a>. </p>
   - W3C Link Check [https://validator.w3.org/checklink]: errors and
   warnings reported:
      - Line: 1346 *http://www.movescount.com/moves/move121790545*
      <http://www.movescount.com/moves/move121790545>* Status*: 404 *Not
      Found* … manual check: ok
      - Line: 3340
      *https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/shapefile.pdf*
      <https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/shapefile.pdf>* Status*:
      403 Forbidden … manual check: ok (and we’re removing this
reference in the
      next release)
      - Lines: 1528, 1565, 2590, 2591, 2592, 2593, 2594, 2595, 2596, 2712,
      2854 *http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql*
      <http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql>* Status*: 302 -> 200 OK
      (redirect) plus warnings about broken fragments; this is an OWL ontology
      downloaded as RDF/XML; the fragments exist as expected (e.g. `#sfWithin`)
      - Lines: 2650, 2854 *http://www.geonames.org/ontology*
      <http://www.geonames.org/ontology>* redirected to *
      *http://www.geonames.org/ontology/documentation.html*
      <http://www.geonames.org/ontology/documentation.html>* Status*: 303
      -> 200 OK (redirect) plus warnings about broken fragments; with correct
      content negotiation (e.g. `curl -H "Accept: application/rdf+xml" -X GET "
      http://www.geonames.org/ontology#nearby"`), you get RDF/XML within
      which the fragments exist as expected (e.g. `#nearby`)
      - Line: 2305 *http://www.pdok.nl/* <http://www.pdok.nl/>* Status*:
      302 -> 500 *Internal Server Error* … manual check: ok
      - Lines: 1201, 1203 *http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1089/oj*
      <http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1089/oj>* Status*: 302 ->
500 *Internal
      Server Error* … manual check: ok
      - 21 links not checked due to robots exclusion rules … manual check:
      ok
      - a bunch of redirects are flagged with warnings; this is the Linked
      Data ID-to-DOC pattern behaving as expected

Over to one of you for creating the DIFF and doing all that's necessary to
make the Webmaster happy.

BR, Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:14:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 28 March 2017 13:14:49 UTC