+1 to help consensus building ? ed On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 at 12:10 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: > Clemens, > > +1 from me to this suggestion. > > (with my editor hat on, I'm waiting for working group consensus to emerge) > > Jeremy > > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 18:00 Clemens Portele < > portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote: > > Hi all, > > in the BP call today [1] we discussed, if BP 12 [2] could or should be > removed. > > Currently the BP is almost empty and the topics raised in the BP are > already included in BP 11 [3] regarding spatial searches (neighbourhood, > bounding box) and free text searches. It feels as if there is not enough > content left to keep a separate BP providing original, actionable guidance. > There is also the old ISSUE-186 [4]. > > An alternative option could be to move all search related aspects out of > BP 11 and to BP 12. > > My proposal would be to keep the API related guidance for spatial data in > a single BP, complementing the general guidance in the DWBP (DW BPs 23 to > 26) [5]. > > Any thoughts from the group? > > Clemens > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html > [2] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api > [3] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis > [4] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186 > [5] https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs > > -- *Ed Parsons *FRGS Geospatial Technologist, Google Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 www.edparsons.com @edparsons
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 15:56:05 UTC