RE: Inclusion of non-geometric ways to describe location (e.g. address and geocode) in BP10? from Svensson, Lars on 2017-03-13 (public-sdw-wg@w3.org from March 2017)

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:38:04 +0000
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2C4E65@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>

On Saturday, March 11, 2017 11:05 AM, Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com] wrote:

[...]
> The OGC's GML Simple Features Profile [4] defines three levels of compliance: SF-0,
> SF-1 and SF-2 - each of which become progressively less restrictive profiles from 0 to
> 2. Above 2 you're using everything that GML has; kitchen sink and all! I wonder if
> these notions of profiling for interoperability might be a useful inclusion in BP10?
> section "2.1 Introduction" provides a good starting point (but then I suppose that's the
> point).

Yay: Application profiles getting more and more important all the time!

/Lars

Received on Monday, 13 March 2017 08:38:41 UTC