W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2017

Re: BP: updates to section 12.6, removal of section 12.8

From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:09:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CADtUq_1ZJ_iu-2XPE021RMTV-JVcT3On+_Poj-3G5Y2n2hSUSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
agreed. that said, it's magic that works _much_ of the time, so I'm happy
with that ...

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 at 09:47 Clemens Portele <
portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote:

> Thanks, Jeremy.
>
> git can be a mystery at times …
>
> Clemens
>
>
>
> On 11 Mar 2017, at 10:25, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Clemens
>
> all merged. although I had to work around a merge conflict on PR 604.
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 at 05:09 Clemens Portele <
> portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote:
>
> Jeremy, Linda, all,
>
> a pull request has been created
>
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/603
>
> It covers the discussion below and the decisions concerning BPs 12 and 13
> in the meeting on March 8:
>
> • BPs 12 and 13 have been removed as agreed in the meeting on March 8,
> 2017.
> • The BP markup for the two BPs has been kept to avoid renumbering of BPs
> in this edit.
> • Some content has been moved to section 12.6 and BP 11 and other content
> from the email discussions has been added.
> • References to BPs 12 and 13 have been updated.
> • Section 12.8 is obsolete and has been removed, too.
>
> I have also created a separate pull request to include a paragraph in BP
> 11 about the recent OGC White Paper on Open Geospatial APIs (
> http://docs.opengeospatial.org/wp/16-019r4/16-019r4.html) and in
> particular about the "OGC API Essentials".
>
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/604
>
> Best regards,
> Clemens
>
>
> On 9 Mar 2017, at 17:02, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes please to all of the above!
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 16:00 Clemens Portele <
> portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote:
>
> Jeremy,
>
> I just had a look at the section and agree that it does not add anything
> important to what we have already in 12.6 / BP11.
>
> I could make the change / PR together with the edits for BP12/BP13 (I just
> looked at the minutes from yesterday). I will make the changes discussed in
> the email discussion and update all references to these BPs - by Saturday
> at the latest.
>
> I assume I should leave stubs for BP12 / BP13 in there for now to avoid
> renumbering and we deal with the order/numbering in the last sprint?
>
> Best regards,
> Clemens
>
>
> On 9 Mar 2017, at 16:44, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" [1] doesn't contain any
> best practices itself, and only seems to duplicate information in the
> revised BP11.
>
> It exists because we intended to echo the headings from DWBP.
>
> I don't think we need it anymore.
>
> Clemens, Linda; what do you think?
>
> If you agree, I'd like to invite one of you to delete the offending
> section and submit a PR. Please.
>
> Thanks, Jeremy
>
>
> [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bp-large-datasets
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 11 March 2017 10:10:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 11 March 2017 10:10:12 UTC