- From: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:09:26 +0000
- To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Message-ID: <71C35634-1FAF-4E3D-84BC-D3E956BE06AB@interactive-instruments.de>
Jeremy, Linda, all, a pull request has been created https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/603 It covers the discussion below and the decisions concerning BPs 12 and 13 in the meeting on March 8: • BPs 12 and 13 have been removed as agreed in the meeting on March 8, 2017. • The BP markup for the two BPs has been kept to avoid renumbering of BPs in this edit. • Some content has been moved to section 12.6 and BP 11 and other content from the email discussions has been added. • References to BPs 12 and 13 have been updated. • Section 12.8 is obsolete and has been removed, too. I have also created a separate pull request to include a paragraph in BP 11 about the recent OGC White Paper on Open Geospatial APIs (http://docs.opengeospatial.org/wp/16-019r4/16-019r4.html) and in particular about the "OGC API Essentials". https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/604 Best regards, Clemens On 9 Mar 2017, at 17:02, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com<mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote: yes please to all of the above! Jeremy On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 16:00 Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de<mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote: Jeremy, I just had a look at the section and agree that it does not add anything important to what we have already in 12.6 / BP11. I could make the change / PR together with the edits for BP12/BP13 (I just looked at the minutes from yesterday). I will make the changes discussed in the email discussion and update all references to these BPs - by Saturday at the latest. I assume I should leave stubs for BP12 / BP13 in there for now to avoid renumbering and we deal with the order/numbering in the last sprint? Best regards, Clemens On 9 Mar 2017, at 16:44, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com<mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>> wrote: SDW-BP section 12.8 "Dealing with large datasets" [1] doesn't contain any best practices itself, and only seems to duplicate information in the revised BP11. It exists because we intended to echo the headings from DWBP. I don't think we need it anymore. Clemens, Linda; what do you think? If you agree, I'd like to invite one of you to delete the offending section and submit a PR. Please. Thanks, Jeremy [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#bp-large-datasets
Received on Saturday, 11 March 2017 05:10:10 UTC