Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search capability in your data access API

+1

On Sat, 4 Mar 2017, 12:35 AM Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On 3/3/2017 8:15 AM, Scott Simmons wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> <
> andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Andrea
>
> ----
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Linda van den Brink [l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl]
> *Sent:* 03 March 2017 11:13
> *To:* Ed Parsons; Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List
> *Subject:* RE: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search
> capability in your data access API
>
> +1
>
>
> *Van:* Ed Parsons [mailto:eparsons@google.com <eparsons@google.com>]
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 2 maart 2017 16:49
> *Aan:* Jeremy Tandy; Clemens Portele; SDW WG Public List
> *Onderwerp:* Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP 12 - Include search
> capability in your data access API
>
>
> +1 to help consensus building ?
>
>
> ed
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 at 12:10 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Clemens,
>
>
> +1 from me to this suggestion.
>
>
> (with my editor hat on, I'm waiting for working group consensus to emerge)
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 18:00 Clemens Portele <
> portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> in the BP call today [1] we discussed, if BP 12 [2] could or should be
> removed.
>
> Currently the BP is almost empty and the topics raised in the BP are
> already included in BP 11 [3] regarding spatial searches (neighbourhood,
> bounding box) and free text searches. It feels as if there is not enough
> content left to keep a separate BP providing original, actionable guidance.
> There is also the old ISSUE-186 [4].
>
> An alternative option could be to move all search related aspects out of
> BP 11 and to BP 12.
>
> My proposal would be to keep the API related guidance for spatial data in
> a single BP, complementing the general guidance in the DWBP (DW BPs 23 to
> 26) [5].
>
> Any thoughts from the group?
>
> Clemens
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/03/01-sdwbp-minutes.html
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#include-search-api
> [3] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#convenience-apis
> [4] https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/186
> [5] https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#accessAPIs
>
> --
>
> *Ed Parsons *FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
>
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501>
> www.edparsons.com @edparsons
>
>
>
>