public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from July to September 2009 by date

Wednesday, 30 September 2009

• Re: Entailment Regimes Doc Steve Harris
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime & inconsistencies Birte Glimm
• RE: Question about literals in subject position Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Entailment Regimes Doc Birte Glimm
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime & inconsistencies Chimezie Ogbuji
• Entailment Regimes Doc Steve Harris
• RE: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 29 September 2009

• [TF-LIB] From a user Seaborne, Andy
• [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime & inconsistencies Birte Glimm
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Steve Harris
• minutes from today.... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-09-29 Axel Polleres
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Chimezie Ogbuji
• RE: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Paul Gearon
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Luke Wilson-Mawer
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Luke Wilson-Mawer
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Paul Gearon
• Re: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Paul Gearon
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Paul Gearon
• Re: [TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues Axel Polleres
• Re: Telecon 29 sep Agenda Axel Polleres
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Alexandre Passant
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Luke Wilson-Mawer
• RE: service description vocabulary Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Ivan Herman
• RE: service description vocabulary Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Olivier Corby
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Steve Harris
• RE: minutes of today... Simon Schenk
• Re: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Luke Wilson-Mawer
• Re: [TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues Lee Feigenbaum
• regrets Simon Schenk
• Re: [TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues Bijan Parsia
• RE: [TF-PP] Possible starting points Seaborne, Andy
• [TF-PP] Possible starting points Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Alexandre Passant
• RE: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Seaborne, Andy
• RE: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Steve Harris
• RE: Updated on the Features and Rationale document Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Updated on the Features and Rationale document Alexandre Passant
• Re: service description vocabulary Steve Harris
• [TF-ENT] Requirements and Issues Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Updated on the Features and Rationale document Seaborne, Andy
• Re: service description vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: service description vocabulary Steve Harris
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Ivan Herman
• Re: service description vocabulary Alexandre Passant
• Re: service description vocabulary Steve Harris
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Ivan Herman
• Re: service description vocabulary Alexandre Passant
• Re: service description vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated on the Features and Rationale document Alexandre Passant
• Checking in on our issues Lee Feigenbaum
• SPARQL Errata Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: service description vocabulary Gregory Williams

Monday, 28 September 2009

• Uniform, Core RDF Update Protocol for HTTP (FPWD) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Updated on the Features and Rationale document Gregory Williams
• Updated on the Features and Rationale document Alexandre Passant
• RE: Telecon 29 sep Agenda Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Telecon 29 sep Agenda Polleres, Axel
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Paul Gearon
• RE: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: service description vocabulary Gregory Williams
• Re: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Paul Gearon
• Re: service description vocabulary Gregory Williams
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: update= vs query= (was: Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/78) Paul Gearon
• RE: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Question about literals in subject position Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Birte Glimm
• RE: service description vocabulary Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Definition of Basic Graph Pattern Matching & Pattern Instance Mapping Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• RE: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• RE: Question about literals in subject position Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Ivan Herman

Sunday, 27 September 2009

• Re: update= vs query= Steve Harris
• Re: Re 2: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re 2: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Ivan Herman
• RE: WG documents Seaborne, Andy
• RE: update= vs query= Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 26 September 2009

• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: service description vocabulary Steve Harris
• Re: update= vs query= Steve Harris
• Re: service description vocabulary Steve Harris
• Re: service description vocabulary Steve Harris
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Chimezie Ogbuji

Friday, 25 September 2009

• Re: service description vocabulary Gregory Williams
• GROUP BY expressions Seaborne, Andy
• WG documents Seaborne, Andy
• RE: minutes of today... Seaborne, Andy
• RE: minutes of today... Seaborne, Andy
• [TF-ENT] Moved Entailment Regimes document to the SPARQL wiki Birte Glimm
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Ivan Herman
• RE: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Re: [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Ivan Herman
• RE: update= vs query= Seaborne, Andy
• Re: service description vocabulary Alexandre Passant
• Re: service description vocabulary Gregory Williams
• Re: service description vocabulary Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: service description vocabulary Gregory Williams
• Re: service description vocabulary Lee Feigenbaum
• service description vocabulary Gregory Williams

Thursday, 24 September 2009

• Notes on SPARQL Protocol update Simon K Johnston
• [TF-ENT] RDFS entailment regime proposal Birte Glimm
• Definition of Basic Graph Pattern Matching & Pattern Instance Mapping Birte Glimm
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Steve Harris
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Steve Harris
• More errata Birte Glimm
• Errata SPARQL 1.0 Birte Glimm
• Re: update= vs query= Steve Harris
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Birte Glimm
• W3C mails are categorised as spam Birte Glimm
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Steve Harris
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Bijan Parsia
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Steve Harris

Wednesday, 23 September 2009

• Re: update= vs query= Jacek Kopecky
• Re: update= vs query= Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: update= vs query= Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: update= vs query= Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: update= vs query= Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: update= vs query= (was: Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/78) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Luke Wilson-Mawer
• update= vs query= (was: Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/78) Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

• Re: Introduction: Lee Feigenbaum Lee Feigenbaum
• RE: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:FunctionLibrary#Starting_Points Seaborne, Andy
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:FunctionLibrary#Starting_Points Axel Polleres
• minutes of today... Axel Polleres
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Birte Glimm
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Axel Polleres
• Re: Question about literals in subject position Paul Gearon
• Question about literals in subject position Birte Glimm
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda Tues. 22-Sep-2009 Axel Polleres
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda Tues. 22-Sep-2009 Seaborne, Andy

Monday, 21 September 2009

• SPARQL WG Agenda Tues. 22-Sep-2009 Axel Polleres

Sunday, 20 September 2009

• RE: Apologies Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 17 September 2009

• Apologies Paul Gearon
• FYI: RDB2RDF WG has started Ivan Herman
• Fwd: Join the SPARQL Working Group (Call for Participation) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

• New Editors for SPARQL documents Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 15 September 2009

• RE: Separate grammar document for spec Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Paul Gearon
• Meeting minutes for 2009-09-15 Alexandre Passant
• Separate grammar document for spec Simon Schenk
• regrets for 9/15 Simon K Johnston
• Re: SPARQL Function Library TF meeting tomorrow 14:00 (one hour before regular call) Axel Polleres
• [TF-PP] Scoping the design space Seaborne, Andy
• RE: service description discovery Jacek Kopecky
• RE: service description discovery Seaborne, Andy
• Re: service description discovery Ivan Herman
• Re: service description discovery Alexandre Passant

Monday, 14 September 2009

• SPARQL Function Library TF meeting tomorrow 14:00 (one hour before regular call) Axel Polleres
• SPARQL WG Agenda Tues. 15-Sep-2009 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: service description discovery Gregory Williams
• Re: The syntax of the SELECT clause. Paul Gearon
• Re: Personal Straw Poll about XMLLiteral Paul Gearon
• RE: Personal Straw Poll about XMLLiteral Seaborne, Andy
• Re: service description discovery Steve Harris
• Re: Personal Straw Poll about XMLLiteral Alexandre Passant
• RE: service description discovery Jacek Kopecky
• Personal Straw Poll about XMLLiteral Bijan Parsia
• The syntax of the SELECT clause. Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Bijan Parsia
• Re: service description discovery Alexandre Passant
• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Bijan Parsia
• RE: service description discovery Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Ivan Herman
• Re: service description discovery Steve Harris
• RE: Exact format for XML Literals? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Ivan Herman
• RE: Exact format for XML Literals? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: service description discovery Alexandre Passant

Friday, 11 September 2009

• RR2009: Call for Participation (Early registration deadline: Sep 20th) Axel Polleres

Monday, 14 September 2009

• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Ivan Herman

Sunday, 13 September 2009

• RE: Exact format for XML Literals? Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 12 September 2009

• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Steve Harris

Friday, 11 September 2009

• RE: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Seaborne, Andy
• service description discovery Gregory Williams

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Ivan Herman
• Re: Exact format for XML Literals? Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

• Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18 Paul Gearon
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues 2009-Sep-08 Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Function Library TF (ACTION-75) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Function Library TF (ACTION-75) Seaborne, Andy
• Exact format for XML Literals? Ivan Herman

Monday, 7 September 2009

• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues 2009-Sep-08 Lee Feigenbaum
• RE: Regrets for 8 Sept. Orri Erling
• Regrets for 8 Sept. Alexandre Passant

Thursday, 3 September 2009

• RE: more service description terms to consider Seaborne, Andy
• review for SPARQL2 ends friday Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Semantics of aggregates Steve Harris
• RE: Semantics of aggregates Seaborne, Andy
• more service description terms to consider Gregory Williams

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

• Re: Semantics of aggregates Steve Harris
• Re: Semantics of aggregates Steve Harris

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

• Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18 Gregory Williams
• RE: Semantics of aggregates Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18 Alexandre Passant
• Re: SPARQL HTML forms at endpoint URI (was: Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18) Steve Harris
• SPARQL HTML forms at endpoint URI (was: Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18) Lee Feigenbaum
• RE: Minutes of 2009-08-18 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18 Simon Schenk
• Minutes of 2009-08-18 Steve Harris
• Re: Semantics of aggregates Steve Harris
• RE: Semantics of aggregates Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Semantics of aggregates Steve Harris
• Re: First attempt at a grammar for SPARQL/query 1.1 Steve Harris

Monday, 31 August 2009

• Semantics of aggregates Seaborne, Andy
• RE: First attempt at a grammar for SPARQL/query 1.1 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: First attempt at a grammar for SPARQL/query 1.1 Steve Harris
• Re: Syntax for custom aggregates Steve Harris
• Re: Syntax for custom aggregates Lee Feigenbaum
• Syntax for custom aggregates Seaborne, Andy
• RE: No SPARQL WG Call tomorrow September 1 Seaborne, Andy
• No SPARQL WG Call tomorrow September 1 Lee Feigenbaum
• test cases (was: Re: Variable scope for subqueries) Lee Feigenbaum
• RE: Function Library TF (ACTION-75) Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Variable scope for subqueries Seaborne, Andy
• RE: First attempt at a grammar for SPARQL/query 1.1 Seaborne, Andy
• Update issues Lee Feigenbaum
• Variable scope for subqueries Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 30 August 2009

• Re: First attempt at a grammar for SPARQL/query 1.1 Gregory Williams

Saturday, 29 August 2009

• Function Library TF (ACTION-75) Axel Polleres

Friday, 28 August 2009

• First attempt at a grammar for SPARQL/query 1.1 Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 26 August 2009

• Minutes from 2009-08-25 teleconference Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 25 August 2009

• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues 2009-Aug-25 Axel Polleres
• RE: SPARQL Query Problem - perhaps solvable in 1.1? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL Query Problem - perhaps solvable in 1.1? Dan Brickley
• Re: SPARQL Query Problem - perhaps solvable in 1.1? Lee Feigenbaum
• RE: Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Seaborne, Andy
• SPARQL Query Problem - perhaps solvable in 1.1? Toby Inkster
• Re: Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Ivan Herman
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues 2009-Aug-25 Seaborne, Andy

Monday, 24 August 2009

• SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues 2009-Aug-25 Axel Polleres
• Re: Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Chimezie Ogbuji
• Regrets for tomorrow's telecon Chimezie Ogbuji
• RE: "suboptions" of Option 7 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 21 August 2009

• RE: "suboptions" of Option 7 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: "suboptions" of Option 7 Alexandre Passant
• RE: Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 20 August 2009

• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Steve Harris

Wednesday, 19 August 2009

• Re: Re : Option 8 Gregory Williams
• Re: Re : Option 8 Axel Polleres
• Re: "suboptions" of Option 7 Gregory Williams
• Re: Re : Option 8 (was: Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms) Gregory Williams
• Re: "suboptions" of Option 7 Ivan Herman
• Re: "suboptions" of Option 7 Alexandre Passant
• Re : Option 8 (was: Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms) Axel Polleres
• Re: "suboptions" of Option 7 Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 18 August 2009

• Re: Service descriptions: Option 8 Lee Feigenbaum
• Service descriptions: Option 8 Axel Polleres
• "suboptions" of Option 7 Axel Polleres
• Minutes from today... Axel Polleres
• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Simon K Johnston
• Re: Regrets Bijan Parsia
• Regrets Orri Erling
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues 2009-Aug-18 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Gregory Williams
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Gregory Williams

Monday, 17 August 2009

• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Jacek Kopecky
• SPARQL WG Agenda, Tues 2009-Aug-18 Lee Feigenbaum
• [TF-ENT] Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Axel Polleres

Friday, 14 August 2009

• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Steve Harris
• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 13 August 2009

• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Steve Harris
• RIF LC comments solicited... Axel Polleres
• Re: Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Alexandre Passant
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Steve Harris
• Service discovery redux - endpoint-based mechanisms Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 11 August 2009

• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Steve Harris
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Greg Williams
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Axel Polleres
• Re: Service description schema Steve Harris
• Re: Service description schema Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Queriable End Point Descriptions Gregory Williams
• Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Steve Harris
• Re: Queriable End Point Descriptions Steve Harris
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Steve Harris
• Minutes from 2009-08-11 Simon Schenk
• Queriable End Point Descriptions Orri Erling
• Re: Service description schema Steve Harris
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Kendall Clark
• Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions... Axel Polleres
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Gregory Williams
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Kendall Clark
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Gregory Williams
• apologies Simon K Johnston
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Kendall Clark
• Re: Service description schema Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Chimezie Ogbuji
• RE: Discovering service descriptions Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Service description schema Steve Harris
• Re: Service description schema Alexandre Passant
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Steve Harris
• Service description schema Steve Harris
• apologies Paul Gearon
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Gregory Williams
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Steve Harris
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Gregory Williams

Monday, 10 August 2009

• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for Tues 2009-08-11 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Jacek Kopecky
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda for Tues 2009-08-11 Steve Harris
• SPARQL WG Agenda for Tues 2009-08-11 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Steve Harris
• Re: Discovering service descriptions Steve Harris
• RE: Discovering service descriptions Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Discovering service descriptions Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Discovering service descriptions Seaborne, Andy
• RE: Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 8 August 2009

• Re: TPAC F2F Lee Feigenbaum
• TPAC F2F Steve Harris
• http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/78 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Initial draft of Design:Aggregate Chimezie Ogbuji

Thursday, 6 August 2009

• Discovering service descriptions Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 4 August 2009

• Minutes from 2009-08-04 Gregory Williams
• [ISSUE-29] Negation: looking for equivalence Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Kick off basic federated query ACTION-76 Simon Schenk
• Re: SubSelect Design Steve Harris
• Kick off basic federated query ACTION-76 Simon Schenk
• RE: [TF-PP] Property Paths use cases Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [TF-PP] Property Paths use cases Luke Wilson-Mawer
• RE: SubSelect Design Seaborne, Andy
• [ACTION-72] Take F&R current version back to wiki for editing Alexandre Passant

Monday, 3 August 2009

• Re: SubSelect Design Steve Harris
• SubSelect Design Steve Harris
• [TF-ENT] Fwd: Entailment Regimes Task Force Birte Glimm
• [TF-ENT] Entailment Regimes Task Force Ivan Herman
• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Ivan Herman
• RE: [TF-PP] Property Paths use cases Seaborne, Andy
• RE: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Seaborne, Andy
• RE: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Seaborne, Andy
• SPARQL Agenda - Tues. Aug. 4, 2009 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 2 August 2009

• Re: [TF-PP] Property Paths use cases Lee Feigenbaum
• [TF-PP] Property Paths use cases Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Birte Glimm
• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Axel Polleres
• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Ivan Herman

Saturday, 1 August 2009

• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Birte Glimm
• Re: Entailment Regimes Task Force Ivan Herman

Friday, 31 July 2009

• Entailment Regimes Task Force Birte Glimm
• RE: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 29 July 2009

• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Steve Harris
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Steve Harris
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Paul Gearon
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Jacek Kopecky
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Jacek Kopecky
• RE: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Paul Gearon
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Kendall Clark
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Steve Harris
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Paul Gearon
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Kendall Clark
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Paul Gearon
• Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Kendall Clark
• [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods Paul Gearon
• Minutes from 2009-07-28 Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

• Property paths task force Seaborne, Andy
• RE: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-28 Ogbuji, Chimezie
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-28 Steve Harris
• Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IBM Graph Update Protocol document Simon Schenk
• Re: Drawing the line on HTTP "Case 2b" Simon Schenk
• Re: Review of SPARQL Update submisson (ACTION-53) Luke Wilson-Mawer
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-28 Bijan Parsia
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-28 Birte Glimm

Monday, 27 July 2009

• Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Lee Feigenbaum
• RE: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Eric Prud'hommeaux
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-28 Axel Polleres

Wednesday, 22 July 2009

• Please enter your unavailabilityy for the summer in the vacation list Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

• RE: Review of SPARQL Update submisson (ACTION-53) Seaborne, Andy
• Wiki page for update issues (ACTION-63) Luke Wilson-Mawer
• Minutes are public at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-07-21 Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-21 Axel Polleres
• Re: Minutes of yesterday's meeting Steve Harris
• Review of SPARQL Update submisson (ACTION-53) Simon K Johnston
• Re: Minutes of yesterday's meeting Simon K Johnston

Monday, 20 July 2009

• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday 2009-07-21 Axel Polleres
• Review of SPARQL Update submisson (ACTION-53) Luke Wilson-Mawer
• SPARQL Working Group Minutes of 14 July 2009 Axel Polleres
• RE: Review of SPARQL Update submisson (ACTION-54) Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 16 July 2009

• Regrets Orri Erling
• Review of SPARQL Update submisson (ACTION-54) Alexandre Passant
• Re: ACTION-56: RESTful HTTP protocol Updates Kjetil Kjernsmo

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

• RE: ACTION-56: RESTful HTTP protocol Updates Seaborne, Andy
• ACTION-56: RESTful HTTP protocol Updates Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Minutes of yesterday's meeting Polleres, Axel
• Minutes of yesterday's meeting Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

• [Fwd: Re: RIF Working Group releases "last call" documents] Axel Polleres
• Re: IBM Graph Update Protocol document Simon K Johnston
• SPARUL and Transactions Orri Erling
• Re: IBM Graph Update Protocol document Steve Harris
• Drawing the line on HTTP "Case 2b" Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: IBM Graph Update Protocol document Kjetil Kjernsmo

Monday, 13 July 2009

• SPARQL WG agenda for Tuesday July 14, 2009 Axel Polleres
• Re: Appologies Birte Glimm
• Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Ivan Herman

Sunday, 12 July 2009

• Appologies Steve Harris

Saturday, 11 July 2009

• RE: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Seaborne, Andy

Friday, 10 July 2009

• Re: First feedback on MINUS Ivan Herman

Thursday, 9 July 2009

• Proposed URIs and schema for service descriptions (ACTION-51) Gregory Williams
• Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Gregory Williams
• Re: First feedback on MINUS Steve Harris
• Re: First feedback on MINUS Simon Schenk
• Re: First feedback on MINUS Lee Feigenbaum
• First feedback on MINUS Simon Schenk
• Re: Implementations of entailment in F&R Birte Glimm

Wednesday, 8 July 2009

• Re: Algebra expression for MINUS Paul Gearon
• RE: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Seaborne, Andy
• RE: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Seaborne, Andy
• Re: IBM Graph Update Protocol document Lee Feigenbaum
• IBM Graph Update Protocol document Simon K Johnston
• Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Algebra expression for MINUS Lee Feigenbaum
• Algebra expression for MINUS Simon Schenk
• regrets Simon Schenk
• Re: Implementations of entailment in F&R Kendall Clark
• Re: Implementations of entailment in F&R Lee Feigenbaum
• Implementations of entailment in F&R Kendall Clark
• Omission in F&R Orri Erling
• More on MINUS vs. UNSAID Lee Feigenbaum

Tuesday, 7 July 2009

• SPARQL WG Minutes from 07 July 2009 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: MINUS vs. UNSAID Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: MINUS vs. UNSAID Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL WG agenda for Tuesday July 7, 2009 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: MINUS vs. UNSAID Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 6 July 2009

• RE: MINUS vs. UNSAID Seaborne, Andy
• semi-progress on ACTION-28 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• MINUS vs. UNSAID Eric Prud'hommeaux
• SPARQL WG agenda for Tuesday July 7, 2009 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: F&R corrections Kjetil Kjernsmo

Friday, 3 July 2009

• RE: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Seaborne, Andy
• RE: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Seaborne, Andy
• F&R corrections Gregory Williams

Thursday, 2 July 2009

• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Paul Gearon
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Steve Harris
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Paul Gearon
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Steve Harris
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Paul Gearon

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Steve Harris
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Paul Gearon
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Steve Harris
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Paul Gearon
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Gregory Williams
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Steve Harris
• Comments on DerviceDescriptions Strawman Simon Schenk
• SPARQL WG minutes from 30-June-2009 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: DESCRIBE ENDPOINT Simon Schenk

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 19:41:53 UTC