- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:15:29 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:07, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: I would like to see > o Specification organization (with SPARQL/Protocol, > separate document, or something else?) > + See ISSUE-31 come after > o Discovery mechanism - 7+ options discussed > + at first F2F http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-30#Finding_service_descriptions > + recently on mailing list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0139.html > + Also resulting mail thread on DESCRIBE_ENDPOINT - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0444.html I think I'll have a stronger view when I know what the consensus looks like. - Steve
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 16:16:14 UTC