- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:07:16 +0100
- To: "Lee Feigenbaum" <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
below, some discussion on the function-library TF, accidently not sent
to the list.
raw minutes of last week's function library TF teleconf available at:
http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-sparql-func-irc
Axel
On 22 Sep 2009, at 13:05, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Axel, why wouldn't we have discussion of the TF on the main mailing
> list?
good point, lee ;-)
>
> Lee
>
> Axel Polleres wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > just looking over the starting point functions at
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:FunctionLibrary#Starting_Points
> >
> > Can't really get my head around
> >
> > LITERAL(str) ->
> > LITERAL(str, IRI) -> (not strictly needed -- xsd:integer("123")
> does it.)
> > LITERAL(str, string) ->
> >
> > Can you give me examples? I don't really see why/where the first one
> > would be needed,
> > also I am not 100% sure what the last one shall be, I assume
> > constructing a lang tagged literal, yes?
> >
> > I started a very rudimentary design page (didn't get very far yet...
> > only the unary ones so far)
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:FunctionLibrary
> >
> > basically the plan is to
> > * extending the tables as they are in section 11.3 of the current
> spec
> > with the newly to be added functions & operators
> > * give a URI to all existing operators, incl the infix ones
> >
> > Axel
> >
> > p.s.: the raw minutes from our last week's call are here:
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/09/15-sparql-func-irc
> >
> >
>
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 16:07:58 UTC