- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:26:09 -0400
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi, I think it would be useful information, particularly since time permitting is the limit, to include in F&R information about existing implementations of OWL entailment in SPARQL. Pellet is one such (with the SPARQL-DL that's been mentioned here) and there may be others; but this seems relevant information and I can't think of any good reasons why it shouldn't be included; if for no other reason, it makes the "time permitting" and the "we must do these" features more parallel and consistent. Cheers, Kendall Clark
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 14:27:12 UTC