Re: Updated on the Features and Rationale document

Hi,

On 28 Sep 2009, at 23:44, Gregory Williams wrote:

> On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Alexandre Passant wrote:
>
>> Input would be appreciated on:
>>
>> - "Basic Federated Query": any idea of implementations besides DARQ ?
>
> I don't believe DARQ would qualify as "basic federated query" (it  
> goes beyond the "basic" part, imo). Wasn't this feature suggested as  
> a formalization of Andy's SERVICE keyword in ARQ?

You're right, it seems to be from the wiki page that this is what was  
agreed.
Can one of the champion of that feature confirm ?

> If so, I also support it in RDF::Query (as listed on the original  
> feature page on the wiki).

In that case, I'll indeed use the list of tools listed on the original  
feature page.
	
Thanks,

Alex.

>
> .greg
>

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .

Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 07:17:08 UTC