- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:36:29 +0100
- To: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
We have a lot of triplestore folks in the group. While unscientific, it would at least give some idea of the feasibility of "fixing" XMLLiteral. So, 1) Does your RDF/XML parser canonicalize rdf:XMLLiterals? 2) Does your NTriples/Turtle/other alt-syntax parser canonical rdf:XMLLiterals? 3) Do you maintain the original syntax of your XMLLiterals, or only retain the canonicalized form? 4) Would you object to changing the lexical space of rdf:XMLLiteral to include non-canonicalized wellformed XML? 5) Would you object to changing the RDF/XML parsing behavior to not canonicalize? The user version includes: 6) Would any of your applications break if the lexical space of XMLLiteral were widened? 7) Would any of your applications break if the parsing of RDF/XML didn't canonicalize? Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 11:31:54 UTC