- From: Greg Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:06:31 -0700
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:01:00PM +0100, Axel Polleres said: > > If we rule out Option 5 entirely, we have no defined way of querying the > service description directly over the very SPARQL endpoint, do we want > that? I feel somehow this could be useful, but don't really have a > strong opinion about it either. We could recommend some variant of > Option 5 on top of one of the others informally and simply not enforce > everybody to support it? Doesn't option 7 (conneg) give you this for free? By using the service URI in a FROM clause, the service description RDF could be pulled in by the endpoint (assuming it didn't keep it loaded) and be queried. .greg
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:17:45 UTC