- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:24:44 -0400
- To: Greg Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Greg Williams wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:01:00PM +0100, Axel Polleres said: >> If we rule out Option 5 entirely, we have no defined way of querying the >> service description directly over the very SPARQL endpoint, do we want >> that? I feel somehow this could be useful, but don't really have a >> strong opinion about it either. We could recommend some variant of >> Option 5 on top of one of the others informally and simply not enforce >> everybody to support it? > > Doesn't option 7 (conneg) give you this for free? By using the service > URI in a FROM clause, the service description RDF could be pulled in by > the endpoint (assuming it didn't keep it loaded) and be queried. Only for stores that dereference HTTP URIs that are part of a query's dataset. Some don't (or aren't always configured to), instead treating graph URIs simply as identifiers within a quad store. Lee
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 02:25:35 UTC