- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@sti2.at>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:00:24 +0200
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> > I would like to see option 2 investigated, because if successful, this > > pattern would IMHO give life to the underused OPTIONS method. > > Agreed. At a first glance it seems like it might not have quite the > right intention, as the RFC says "Responses to this method are not > cacheable". Which wouldn't fit the kind of use-cases I had in mind. Can that be overridden by the header Cache-control: Public? I'm afraid the HTTP RFC can be read both ways... Jacek
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 17:01:00 UTC