Re: SPARQL WG agenda for Tuesday July 7, 2009

I will have to give my regrets for tomorrow's teleconference and the
following weeks as I will be on vacation.

-- Chimezie


On 7/6/09 10:47 AM, "Lee Feigenbaum" <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-07-07
> 
> We'll discuss negation & update - with the goals being to adopt base
> designs for each, if possible.
> 
>      *  Date of Call: Tuesday July 07, 2009
>      * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
>      * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>      * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
>      * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
>      * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
>      * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql
> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
>      * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>      * Duration: 60 minutes
>      * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
>      * Scribe: Kjetil (Scribe List)
>      * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-07-07
> 
> [edit] Regrets
> [edit] Agenda
> 
>      * Admin
>            o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-06-30
>            o Next meeting: 2009-07-14 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT, SteveH to
> scribe (Scribe List)
>      * Liaisons
>            o Anything to report?
>            o OWL WG (Bijan)
>            o HCLS (Eric)
>            o XQuery (Eric)
>            o RIF WG (Axel)
>            o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
>      * Action/issue status - via tracker:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/
>      * Negation:
>            o mails on set based semantics of MINUS
>            o 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0394.html
> UNSAID/NOT EXISTS implemented in ARQ]
>            o See this mail with proposal from AndyS
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009AprJun/0433.html
>      * Update:
>            o AndyS: discuss whether to start with the submission as the
> strawman for the update language. Are there alternatives to consider?
> (After strawman -- start throwing rocks at it to test it out)
>            o If so, I'd like to get one or more reviewers (unconnected
> to the submission, preferably) to do an initial review
> 
> [edit] Regrets
> 
>      * Axel P
> 
> 
> 


===================================

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S. News & World Report (2008).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 03:25:56 UTC