- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:27:59 +0100
- To: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 11 Aug 2009, at 07:59, Alexandre Passant wrote: > Hi, > > Le 11 août 09 à 07:12, Steve Harris a écrit : > >> I'm acutely aware of the dangers of scope creep, but one thing I >> think we ought to be able to say is something like: >> >> <some-resource> sparql:seeEndpoint <http://sparql.example/endpoint> . >> > > There's a sparqlEndpoint property in voiD, that currently has > void:Dataset as a range [1], but I guess they could extend it to > make it more generic. Well, it's reasonable to be able to say that as well, and overloading it doesn't seem appropriate. > Also, SIOC (in the Services module [2]) has a has_service property > that links anything to a related service. This service can then be > defined as being a SPARQL endpoint using: > > <some-resource> siocs:has_service [ > siocs:service_protocol <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/> ; > siocs:service_endpoint <http://sparql.example.org/endpoint> > ] . That looks good though, thanks. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 07:28:38 UTC