- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:41:35 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
As per my action, http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/89, I checked up on all our issues. I either made sure they're tied to a specific feature's design page, tied to an action, could be closed already, or were ready to be closed. The first set are those that I'll propose to close either tomorrow or next week. I'll follow-up after FPWD with editors to schedule TC time for issues that need it. Issue Status and Action == Proposed to Close == PROPOSED: Resolve [http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/3 Subquery syntax (e.g. mandatory curly braces)] by requiring curly braces around subqueries and without introducing a keyword. PROPOSED: Resolve [http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/4 What is the variable scope between main queries and subqueries?] by noting that only variables projected from a subquery are visible outside the subquery and that all other variables and all blank nodes within the subquery are local to the subquery. PROPOSED: Resolve [http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/11 Implicit vs explicit GROUPing] by requiring explicit grouping and prohibiting projecting variables (or scalar functions on variables) not mentioned in GROUP BY. PROPOSED: Resolve [http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/12 Presence and syntactic detail of HAVING clause] in favor of a HAVING clause == Needs more info == http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/23 - what does this mean? == Other action taken == http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/1 - tied to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:BasicFederatedQuery http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/2 - closed, resolved by Phase II charter text on function library issues 4-8,10,13 - tied to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:SubSelect http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/9 - closed, clear consensus that SPARQL Query/1.1 includes subselects in graph patterns issues 14-16, 35, 41 - tied to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Aggregate issues 18-22, 24-28 - already tracked on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/UpdateIssues issue 29 - tied to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Negation http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/30 - no action taken, will be resolved by review & eventually last call publication of restful update doc http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/31 - closed based on decision to publish Service Description document on its own and by decision to discover service descriptions via request on the endpoint URI http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/32 - closed based on resolution at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-04#resolution_2 . issue 33 - already tied to action-77 on Lee issue 34 - tied to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:EntailmentRegimes issue 36, 39 - tied to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Project_Expression
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 03:42:28 UTC