- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:29:03 +0000
- To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Simon Schenk > Sent: 1 September 2009 15:12 > To: Steve Harris > Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group > Subject: Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18 > > Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2009, 15:03 +0100 schrieb Steve Harris: > > Hi All, > > > > I've just read the minutes at > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-18 > > and there seems to be a belief that it's common practice to return > > an HTML form when a SPARQL endpoint URI is requested without the > > SPARQL-mandated parameters. > > > > I'd like to test that assumption - how many systems are known to do > > this? > > Sesame does not. > > Cheers, > Simon > > > Ours do not, for what it's worth. We generate forms, but on another URI. > > > > - Steve > > Joseki does not - the form is on another URL normally. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 14:30:29 UTC