- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:17:55 +0000
- To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Apart from that I have a few more minor editorial errors for the > SPARQL 1.0 spec... > This is really minor, but there is a comma missing in the second > paragraph of 12.6: > ... a triple ( s, p, o ) is in the first pattern if and only if the > triple ( M(s), M(p)*,* M(o) ) is in the second. > Further: > 12.6, Notes (c) These conditions do not impose the SPARQL requirement > that SG share*s* no blank nodes with AG or BGP. Minor request: Catching errata is great - could people put them in a separate email though (pref with the word "errata" in the title) so that they don't get lost. Can't update the original spec yet so these are going to have to be tracked. Andy
Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 13:18:47 UTC