Re: Service description schema

I meant for it to be explicit, but it doesn't really matter which it is.

Seems like SIOC has something very appropriate though.

- Steve

On 11 Aug 2009, at 14:55, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:

> I agree that something like this would be really useful.  I'm a big  
> fan of
> follow-your-nose via explicit RDF vocabulary (rather than network  
> sniffing).
> But did you mean for this sparql:seeEndpoint predicate to be  
> explicitly
> asserted or entailed (or the equivalent)?
>
> -- Chimezie
>
> On 8/11/09 2:12 AM, "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm acutely aware of the dangers of scope creep, but one thing I  
>> think
>> we ought to be able to say is something like:
>>
>> <some-resource> sparql:seeEndpoint <http://sparql.example/endpoint> .
>>
>> ie. an equivalent of rdfs:seeSlso, but with slightly stronger
>> semantics, and meaning that there's a SPARQL endpoint at the object
>> URI, that has some information about the the resource in the subject.
>>
>> It's something we needed to be able to say when building the FAOF
>> Builder (http://foafbuilder.qdos.com/), but weren't able to. In the
>> end we settled for rdfs:seeAlso, which is a pretty bad fit.
>>
>> - Steve
>
>
> ===================================
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S. News & World Report (2008).
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
>
>
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
>

-- 
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
9AD

Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 15:17:12 UTC