- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:46:39 +0100
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 29 Sep 2009, at 09:06, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Passant >> Sent: 29 September 2009 08:16 >> To: Gregory Williams >> Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group >> Subject: Re: Updated on the Features and Rationale document >> >> Hi, >> >> On 28 Sep 2009, at 23:44, Gregory Williams wrote: >> >>> On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Alexandre Passant wrote: >>> >>>> Input would be appreciated on: >>>> >>>> - "Basic Federated Query": any idea of implementations besides >>>> DARQ ? >>> >>> I don't believe DARQ would qualify as "basic federated query" (it >>> goes beyond the "basic" part, imo). Wasn't this feature suggested as >>> a formalization of Andy's SERVICE keyword in ARQ? >> >> You're right, it seems to be from the wiki page that this is what was >> agreed. >> Can one of the champion of that feature confirm ? > > From my POV, getting anything more than basic connectivity for this > round of standardization looks too ambitious. The minimum is the > ability of one processor to be able to call another. > > http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/service.html > Added to F&R. > Thanks, I also added links to the other implementations supporting it. Greg, do you want to add some more text about the RDF::Query capabilities ? There are examples of queries using such federation on the wiki page [1]. Which system do they come from, is that using ARQ syntax (FROM SERVICE) ? > This would be an optional feature. You mean time-permitting ? > > Andy > > When the HTML was copied to the wiki, all the section numbers were > copied as well. And then mediawiki adds section numbers ... Indeed, that's a bit of a mess on the wiki :-/ But I'll take care of that when merging with the current F&R doc in SVN. Best, Alex. [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:BasicFederatedQuery > >> >>> If so, I also support it in RDF::Query (as listed on the original >>> feature page on the wiki). >> >> In that case, I'll indeed use the list of tools listed on the >> original >> feature page. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alex. >> >>> >>> .greg >>> >> >> -- >> Dr. Alexandre Passant >> Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> National University of Ireland, Galway >> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> . >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:47:21 UTC