- From: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:11:40 +0100
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
HI, On 19 Aug 2009, at 19:06, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Alexandre Passant wrote: > >> While I'm really willing to see RDFa annotated endpoints, I think >> that 2 issues in that case would be: >> - Some endpoints do not provide any forms for query input (unless >> we want to say in the next spec that any endpoint must have a form >> for query input - I'd favor that as well) > > I'm not sure having a service description in HTML and/or RDFa > implies that the HTML *has* to have a query form. I should have said - some endpoint do not provide any HTML page and just raise an error if no query is sent. That's something we have to consider regarding that proposal. Alex. > It might be nice, but the spec might not have to force the query > form on everybody (and in fact not doing so might help us re: abuse > of conneg, allowing the people who are going to add a query form to > be the ones who are abusing conneg, not the spec). > > .greg > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 11:35:43 UTC