- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:48:11 +0100
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 11 Aug 2009, at 23:01, Axel Polleres wrote: > Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> This seems to me the same as Option 5 - this just means that the >> service >> description data is queryable like any other data accessible by the >> SPARQL engine. > > ok, wasn't entirely clear in which way, i.e. whether these should be > in the default graph (wouldn't make sense to me), in a named graph > (GRAPH, also limited sense only), or queryable by an explicit > dataset clause (FROM). the latter would be the only one that makes > sense to me, anyways. > > If we rule out Option 5 entirely, we have no defined way of querying > the service description directly over the very SPARQL endpoint, do > we want that? I feel somehow this could be useful, but don't really > have a strong opinion about it either. We could recommend some > variant of Option 5 on top of one of the others informally and > simply not enforce everybody to support it? I don't think anyone's said it's not useful, it's just that there are a number of situations where it's very hard, or extremely kludgy to implement. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:48:50 UTC