- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:02:42 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 14:50:05 Gregory Williams wrote: > Doesn't this assume that you have control over the entire server? This > would be a non-starter for any endpoint that didn't, e.g. a directory- > based apache handler, or a CGI. Yup, that's partly why I suggested it as an optional feature. To support a feature that says "this is what this server can do", you would necessarily need to have some influence of the server config anyway, but indeed, not everyone can be expected to support this. I don't know how big that problem would be in reality though? > And there's still the tool support issue of using OPTIONS, compared to > the much more prevalent GET/HEAD/POST verbs. Yeah, it is a real problem, but nevertheless, I think it is better than nothing for those who can use it, and I see no obvious drawbacks for those that do. Kind regards Kjetil Kjernsmo -- Senior Knowledge Engineer / SPARQL F&R Editor Mobile: +47 986 48 234 Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com Web: http://www.computas.com/ | SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE | Computas AS PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 1001
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 13:03:17 UTC