- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:29:36 +0000
- To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Keeping in sync is important. http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/sparql-1.1.html has two entry point: QueryUnit and UpdateUnit because the majority of the grammar rules go into pattern matching, most of it is shared material. If we separate out the various components and process separately, then we need to manage numbering and links across fragments. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Simon Schenk > Sent: 15 September 2009 16:14 > To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > Subject: Separate grammar document for spec > > Hi, > > Paul and I are thinking about whether it would be a good idea to extract > the fragment of the grammar common to Query and Update to a separate xml > file and include it into both documents. That should prevent them from > getting out of sync. > > Comments? > > Cheers, > Simon > > -- > Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz > http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de > http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~sschenk > Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 16:31:25 UTC