- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:49:39 -0400
- To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
- CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Simon Schenk wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2009, 21:58 +0100 schrieb Steve Harris: >> <> Might be more conventional. That depends on what BASE defaults to >> though. It will still map to some graph inside the store, which >> restricts the things you can import into the store without confusing >> the discovery. > > I don't understand. If <> is mapped to some graph, whose name no one > except for the endpoint itself needs to know, the name does not need a > globally valid name. Then, there should be no problem? I believe the problem is that <> has a well-defined name - it's whatever base URI is in effect when executing the query. Don't ask me to repeat/recite the rules for determining the base URI though, because I always have to go look them up. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding :) Lee
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 06:50:27 UTC