- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:19:36 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Is there going to be a requirements phase? We seem to discussing requirements in the guise of implicit assumptions in the proposed text. How are issues going to be handled? The WG has an issue tracker - is that going to be used? Who arises issues? Andy
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:20:59 UTC