Taking Two Weeks Off W3C
Experiment Design
Minutes: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon
How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O?
Wordsmithing of Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum)
ISSUE-2: Need to think about things which are programmatically available but not visible (popups, icon fonts, background images, sprites). may need an sc.
lvtf-ACTION-98: Create definition of spatial layout for text resize
Re: Resize content responses (was agenda for telco)
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon
- Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon
- Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon
Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG?
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG?
- Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG?
Quick update on table borders and other visual affordances related to User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum)
Using Markdown for Github accessibility
Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
- Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?
Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- RE: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
- Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?)
updated Personalization settings WIKI page
Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
- Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?
Can you add table borders to TRx?
Media control contrast
Joint call - Cognitive Accessibility Task Force Teleconference - Low Vision Task Force on personalization - Monday, April 24, 2017
Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle"
LVTF Meeting Minutes - April 20, 2017
A measure of element growth due to changing font family.
Re: Joint Call on Monday 24 April
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 20 April 2017 telecon
To LVTF -- Re: open issues and things to edit
Please complete this week's AG WG surveys
[public-low-vision-a11y-tf] <none>
LVTF Meeting Minutes 4/13/17
lvtf-ACTION-97: Will schedule time for tpac
Availability to attend teleconferences updated
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 13 April 2017 telecon
Lets Change Meta Data Back, and Put it on the agenda
Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey
Technolog Agnostic / Independent
Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions?
- Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions?
User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox
Please complete this week's AG WG survey
Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC
- Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC
- Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC
- RE: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC
RE: Setting a more visible focus indicator
New Proposed Wording for Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum)
quick question...answer in 2 hours
LVTF Meeting Minutes - 4/6/2017
Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues
Special fonts don't matter for font-family change.
- Re: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change.
- RE: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change.