- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:02:10 -0500
- To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngERg69JDwpNAOuiLPiBX2DH7orrC4sH0vws14y==iLEOTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Oh awesome and wonderful LVTF, I had a great "conversation" with David MacDonald and Jared Smith about making the proposed SC User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) a bit easier to understand. I've made changes based on their suggestions this afternoon. You can check out the new wording at https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/10 (or just read below). SC Shortname User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) SC Text All essential visual identifiers of user interface components have a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, except for the following situations: 1. Thicker: A contrast ratio of at least 3:1 is required where the minimum width and height are at least 3 CSS pixels, for the essential visual identifier. 2. Inactive: Disabled or otherwise inactive user interface components are exempt from this requirement. *Note about essential visual identifiers of user interface components:* A visual indication that the component is interactive. This may be a border, edge, icon, or other visual indication (which doesn't rely on color alone). Focus and selection indicators represent separate states of the interface component which also must meet this requirement. Yes, yes, I know the "note" will need to become a definition in the glossary, but trust me, to understand this proposed SC...you need to see that note as you are reading the SC. I promise to move it to the glossary later...after we settle on proposed SC language that everyone can live with. Peace out, Goodwitch glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 23:02:44 UTC