- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:02:10 -0500
- To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngERg69JDwpNAOuiLPiBX2DH7orrC4sH0vws14y==iLEOTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Oh awesome and wonderful LVTF,
I had a great "conversation" with David MacDonald and Jared Smith about
making the proposed SC User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) a bit
easier to understand.
I've made changes based on their suggestions this afternoon. You can check
out the new wording at https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/10 (or just
read below).
SC Shortname
User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum)
SC Text
All essential visual identifiers of user interface components have a
contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, except for the following situations:
1. Thicker: A contrast ratio of at least 3:1 is required where the
minimum width and height are at least 3 CSS pixels, for the essential
visual identifier.
2. Inactive: Disabled or otherwise inactive user interface components
are exempt from this requirement.
*Note about essential visual identifiers of user interface components:* A
visual indication that the component is interactive. This may be a border,
edge, icon, or other visual indication (which doesn't rely on color alone).
Focus and selection indicators represent separate states of the interface
component which also must meet this requirement.
Yes, yes, I know the "note" will need to become a definition in the
glossary, but trust me, to understand this proposed SC...you need to see
that note as you are reading the SC. I promise to move it to the glossary
later...after we settle on proposed SC language that everyone can live with.
Peace out,
Goodwitch
glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773
*web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 23:02:44 UTC