W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:59:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpvfOdU7sQ=_dzu6E1U9=Z28-j4mVKnCWQA1wHVVKod54rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Stephen Repsher <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, To Henry <shawn@w3.org>, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Jason J White <jjwhite@ets.org>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Gregg and all,

On 4/24/17, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote:
> We need to be careful that we don’t write the guidelines to only apply for
> today. We want to write guidelines that will apply for the future as well.
>
> So, I don’t think that we can drop the phrase because it works with technologies
> today if we know there is a revolution coming. And there is a revolution coming
> including 3-D immersive etc

If that is the case, do we need the "technologies being used" language
on all of our SCs?

> As to what technologies there are out there today, I’m not the expert on that. I just
> posted another message just before this asking that question.

Thank you.

Kindest Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 14:00:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 27 April 2017 14:44:35 UTC