- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:14:40 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1WnXPLhbDGzyrdhCA46WEH9OddHhdD3Hbnvs1iTof7Gz4w@mail.gmail.com>
Alastair, On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Glenda, > > My initial reaction is that it doesn't fit in either, but taking a little > step back, what's the issue we are trying to solve? > > Presumably it is tables which have very low-contrast borders/backgrounds? > > A (valid) table has semantics, so the borders are under the user's > control, to the same extent that text-adaptation is under user-control. > > Rather than hack apart either of the current SCs, I would rather spend > time bolstering the recommendations on the contrast ratio for both the > current SCs. > > I was reviewing the comments on graphics contrast, and there were two > notable ones on the ratios: > > Trace: "The other contrast levels were chosen to apply to text you are > trying to read running text. ... For graphic objects do not have the same > constraint and lower contrast could be used. However we could find no > research that would backup what contrast should be." [1] > > Webaim: "We believe additional clarification and research is needed > regarding the relevance of the current WCAG-defined contrast requirements > to modern displays and users. These WCAG formulas and thresholds for > contrast are primarily based on research conducted in 2001 on an Amiga 1000 > display. Display technology and user adeptness has certainly changed > significantly since then, yet few people question the applicability of this > research to the modern web." > > So I think we need to: > > 1. Establish if we have any research on non-text contrast for people with > low vision. > > 2. Setup some test cases in a survey format (not W3C survey, a nice > version) where we can get people to say what they can see well enough. > > Does anyone object to that focus? > > I think both are useful to explore. Marla and I hacked together some initial content [1] that could be expanded to include table borders and other items and converted into a survey. 1. https://jsfiddle.net/a11y_guy/p9db2f6w/33/ -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2017 22:15:16 UTC