Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?

More than that, I’m suggesting we ignore them altogether for 2.1. 

They aren’t being developed by the companies behind them, and as far as I can tell there aren’t companies developing with them either.

Unless someone can show otherwise, let’s not factor them into the discussion.

-Alastair

Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:47:39 UTC