W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now?

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:23:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpvcN4WgzBNouXFvrr_CoDqjdey3GsoDeJmfKgBj3E2xF6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Hi all,

I added this to the Wiki as proposal N.

Kindest Regards,

On 4/25/17, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Wayne and all,
> Since we are dropping the font bullet from the Adapting Text SC for
> the time being to allow time for more research, I wonder if we should
> do the same for the color bullet?
> We have no consensus on this current bullet:
> * text color and background color to a single different text color and
> a single different background color
> Other language that allows more colors will very likely get push back.
> We could expand Andrew's font note, so the whole thing could read:
> <start draft text>
> Except for images of text and captions, text styles of the page can be
> overridden as follows with no loss of essential content or
> functionality.
> * line spacing (leading) to at least 1.5
> * letter spacing (tracking) to at least 0.12 em
> * word spacing to at least 0.16 em
> Editor's note: The Working Group seeks to include changes in text
> color, background color, and font-family as part of the SC, but is not
> yet able to identify a way to do so that is sufficiently testable.
> </end draft text>
> Thoughts?
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura

Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 19:24:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 27 April 2017 14:44:35 UTC