public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org from April 2017 by author

Alastair Campbell

Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Resize content responses (was agenda for telco) (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" (Friday, 21 April)
Re: [public-low-vision-a11y-tf] <none> (Sunday, 16 April)
Re: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. (Wednesday, 5 April)

David MacDonald

Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Using Markdown for Github accessibility (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Monday, 3 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Monday, 3 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Saturday, 1 April)

Erich Manser

Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon (Thursday, 27 April)
LVTF Meeting Minutes - April 20, 2017 (Thursday, 20 April)
LVTF Meeting Minutes 4/13/17 (Thursday, 13 April)
Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC (Saturday, 8 April)
RE: quick question...answer in 2 hours (Thursday, 6 April)
LVTF Meeting Minutes - 4/6/2017 (Thursday, 6 April)

Glenda Sims

Wordsmithing of Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) (Thursday, 27 April)
Quick update on table borders and other visual affordances related to User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Can you add table borders to TRx? (Friday, 21 April)
Can you add table borders to TRx? (Friday, 21 April)
Re: Media control contrast (Thursday, 20 April)
Re: Media control contrast (Thursday, 20 April)
Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" (Thursday, 20 April)
Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? (Monday, 10 April)
New Proposed Wording for Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) (Thursday, 6 April)

Greg Lowney

Gregg C Vanderheiden

Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Sunday, 23 April)
Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent (Monday, 17 April)
Re: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues (Thursday, 6 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Monday, 3 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Monday, 3 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Monday, 3 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Saturday, 1 April)

Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)

Hakkinen, Mark T

Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)

Jim Allan

Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? (Thursday, 27 April)
Minutes: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon (Thursday, 27 April)
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: updated Personalization settings WIKI page (Monday, 24 April)
updated Personalization settings WIKI page (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Media control contrast (Thursday, 20 April)
Media control contrast (Thursday, 20 April)
Re: Joint Call on Monday 24 April (Wednesday, 19 April)
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 20 April 2017 telecon (Wednesday, 19 April)
To LVTF -- Re: open issues and things to edit (Wednesday, 19 April)
Availability to attend teleconferences updated (Wednesday, 12 April)
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 13 April 2017 telecon (Tuesday, 11 April)
Re: Lets Change Meta Data Back, and Put it on the agenda (Tuesday, 11 April)
Re: User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox (Tuesday, 11 April)
Re: New Proposed Wording for Issue #10 User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? (Monday, 10 April)
quick question...answer in 2 hours (Thursday, 6 April)
Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 6 Apr 2017 Telecon (Wednesday, 5 April)
Re: Testing Consensus on GitHub: Adapting Text Proposal D was (Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text ) (Tuesday, 4 April)
Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 6 Apr 2017 Telecon (Tuesday, 4 April)
Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text (Tuesday, 4 April)
Joint COGA & LVTF telecon - Personalization (Tuesday, 4 April)
Interesting article on color (Tuesday, 4 April)

John Foliot

Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)

Jonathan Avila

RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
RE: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? (Thursday, 27 April)
RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Where should we handle Table Borders and Details/Summary "triangle" (Sunday, 23 April)
RE: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC (Monday, 10 April)
RE: Technolog Agnostic / Independent (Monday, 10 April)
RE: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. (Thursday, 6 April)

Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL

RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
RE: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)

Laura Carlson

Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Tuesday, 25 April)
Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) (Tuesday, 25 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Sunday, 23 April)
Re: Can you add table borders to TRx? (Friday, 21 April)
Re: Please complete this week's AG WG surveys (Monday, 17 April)
Re: Please complete this week's AG WG surveys (Monday, 17 April)
Please complete this week's AG WG surveys (Monday, 17 April)
Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey (Tuesday, 11 April)
Re: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Please complete this week's AG WG survey (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Please complete this week's AG WG survey (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC (Monday, 10 April)
Please complete this week's AG WG survey (Sunday, 9 April)
Re: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues (Thursday, 6 April)
Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues (Wednesday, 5 April)
Re: Popup SC #75 remove (Wednesday, 5 April)
Testing Consensus on GitHub: Adapting Text Proposal D was (Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text ) (Tuesday, 4 April)
Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text (Tuesday, 4 April)
Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text (Tuesday, 4 April)
Please consider completing this week's AG WG survey (Sunday, 2 April)

lisa.seeman

Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Issue Tracker

ISSUE-2: Need to think about things which are programmatically available but not visible (popups, icon fonts, background images, sprites). may need an sc. (Thursday, 27 April)
lvtf-ACTION-98: Create definition of spatial layout for text resize (Thursday, 27 April)
lvtf-ACTION-97: Will schedule time for tpac (Thursday, 13 April)

Marla Runyan

Re: User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox (Wednesday, 12 April)
User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox (Sunday, 9 April)
Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC (Saturday, 8 April)
Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 6 Apr 2017 Telecon (Wednesday, 5 April)
Re: Popup SC #75 remove (Wednesday, 5 April)

Michael Pluke

RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Sunday, 23 April)

Repsher, Stephen J

RE: Resize content responses (was agenda for telco) (Thursday, 27 April)
RE: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 27 Apr 2017 telecon (Thursday, 27 April)
RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Using Markdown for Github accessibility (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
RE: Setting a more visible focus indicator (Friday, 7 April)
RE: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues (Thursday, 6 April)
RE: quick question...answer in 2 hours (Thursday, 6 April)
RE: Testing Consensus on GitHub: Adapting Text Proposal D was (Re: Subtle change to Adapting Text ) (Tuesday, 4 April)
Subtle change to Adapting Text (Tuesday, 4 April)

Rochford, John

RE: Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? (Tuesday, 11 April)

Wayne Dick

Taking Two Weeks Off W3C (Sunday, 30 April)
Experiment Design (Saturday, 29 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Friday, 28 April)
Re: How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? (Friday, 28 April)
How do we distinguish between I, l and 1 and 0 and O? (Thursday, 27 April)
Re: Should we drop the color bullet for now? (Wednesday, 26 April)
Using Markdown for Github accessibility (Tuesday, 25 April)
A measure of element growth due to changing font family. (Wednesday, 19 April)
[public-low-vision-a11y-tf] <none> (Saturday, 15 April)
Re: Agenda: Low Vision Task Force 13 April 2017 telecon (Thursday, 13 April)
Lets Change Meta Data Back, and Put it on the agenda (Tuesday, 11 April)
Technolog Agnostic / Independent (Monday, 10 April)
Am I the only person on the LVTF who cannot follow the GitHub issue discussions? (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Please complete this week's AG WG survey (Monday, 10 April)
Re: User Interface Contrast Ratio Thresholds - sandbox (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Positioning Tooltips - Revisiting Hover SC (Monday, 10 April)
Re: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. (Thursday, 6 April)
Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. (Wednesday, 5 April)
Re: Color Test: A formal proposal (Sunday, 2 April)
Color Test: A formal proposal (Saturday, 1 April)

White, Jason J

RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Tuesday, 25 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)
RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? (Monday, 24 April)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 April 2017 16:40:29 UTC