W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:46:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpvcHdR2vaeNzA0k7hCVvPE2k9Q+NBSgLW4J+4vBOtNSC9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Stephen Repsher <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, To Henry <shawn@w3.org>, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Jason J White <jjwhite@ets.org>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Gregg and all,

On 4/24/17, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote:
> So I agree — stick to web content
> I don’t think we should be making judgements outside of web content

This gets us back to the question Alastair previously asked [7], "Can
we define those for 2017? HTML etc., yes. PDF, yes. What else would
you call a 'major web technology' today?"

Gregg, what is the list of Web technologies that must be supported
beyond HTML and PDF?

I presume that if that list was supported, it would enable us to
remove the "technologies being used" clause. Correct? In other words,
what technologies are we missing?

Thank you.

Kindest Regards,
Laura

[7] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017AprJun/0270.html
-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 12:47:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 27 April 2017 14:44:35 UTC