- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:46:48 -0500
- To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Stephen Repsher <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, To Henry <shawn@w3.org>, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Jason J White <jjwhite@ets.org>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Gregg and all, On 4/24/17, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote: > So I agree — stick to web content > I don’t think we should be making judgements outside of web content This gets us back to the question Alastair previously asked [7], "Can we define those for 2017? HTML etc., yes. PDF, yes. What else would you call a 'major web technology' today?" Gregg, what is the list of Web technologies that must be supported beyond HTML and PDF? I presume that if that list was supported, it would enable us to remove the "technologies being used" clause. Correct? In other words, what technologies are we missing? Thank you. Kindest Regards, Laura [7] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017AprJun/0270.html -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 12:47:22 UTC