w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from December 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• regrets (Friday, 13 December)

Brian McBride

• New Schema Doc (Monday, 23 December)
• critical typo in semantics doc (Monday, 23 December)
• domain of rdfs:member (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Sunday, 22 December)
• concepts LCC now in shadow TR space (Sunday, 22 December)
• Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: test cases LCC (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: file permissions in RDF CVS (Thursday, 19 December)
• file permissions in RDF CVS (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Monday, 16 December)
• Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Saturday, 14 December)
• TR structure created (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: fig 2 now fixed in semantics doc.... (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Help with link? (Was: Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? (Friday, 13 December)
• reminder: outstanding recent actions (Thursday, 12 December)
• action 2002-12-06#11: Last Call Decision (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: semantics clean-up revision (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] (Thursday, 12 December)
• Fwd: Poorman issues tracker (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] (Thursday, 12 December)
• call for agenda items (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Wednesday, 11 December)
• IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Thursday, 5 December)
• Semantics of rdf:value (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Thursday, 5 December)
• call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-13 (Thursday, 12 December)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-06 (Thursday, 5 December)

Dan Brickley

• Re: domain of rdfs:member (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: file permissions in RDF CVS (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: TR structure created (Friday, 13 December)
• schema question: rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource ? (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: action 2002-12-06#11: Last Call Decision (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: Lbase (Sunday, 8 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)

Dan Connolly

• Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: specifying literals (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Saturday, 14 December)
• interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...] (Saturday, 14 December)
• specifying literals (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? (Friday, 13 December)
• checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Friday, 13 December)
• XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences (Friday, 13 December)
• concepts: strings are plain literals (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (Monday, 9 December)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Test cases - ARP report. (Monday, 16 December)
• RDF Parser Test cases report for Raptor (Monday, 16 December)
• RDF XML Syntax Last candidate 2002-12-13 updated after telcon (Friday, 13 December)
• RDF XML Syntax Last Call candidate (Friday, 13 December)
• RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) last call WD draft 2002-12-11 (Wednesday, 11 December)
• RDF Concepts anchors (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: concepts renumbered (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about rdf:parseType="Collection" syntax (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Friday, 6 December)
• RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) draft 2002-12-05 (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Wednesday, 4 December)
• RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Wednesday, 4 December)

Eric Miller

• Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments (Friday, 13 December)

Frank Manola

• Re: Review semantics document (2002-12-13#7) - part 1 (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] (Friday, 20 December)
• new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: Concepts LC candidate (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: action 2002-12-06#11: Last Call Decision (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• What are literals? (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: 'primary' in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: 'primary' in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Sunday, 8 December)
• Re: Semantics of rdf:value (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Semantics of rdf:value (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: datatyping (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Quick review of RDF primer (Tuesday, 3 December)

Graham Klyne

• Review semantics document (2002-12-13#7) - part 1 (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Sunday, 22 December)
• Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Syntax: positive review (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: specifying literals (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...] (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: Help with link? (Was: Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions) (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: concepts: strings are plain literals (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: specifying literals (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences (Saturday, 14 December)
• RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-12-13 (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments (Friday, 13 December)
• Can't access test case manifest, test case comments (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: concepts renumbered (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Question about rdf:parseType="Collection" syntax (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: datatyping (Wednesday, 4 December)

Jan Grant

• test cases LCC (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RDF Parser Test cases report for Raptor (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Test cases - ARP report. (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Test case status (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Thursday, 12 December)
• Test cases, quick update. (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)

Jeremy Carroll

• I18N - Re: test cases LCC (Thursday, 19 December)
• Syntax: positive review (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Test cases - ARP report. (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: specifying literals (Monday, 16 December)
• Last call candidate (really this time) (Friday, 13 December)
• Concepts LC candidate (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: concepts renumbered (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RDF Concepts anchors (Wednesday, 11 December)
• concepts renumbered (Monday, 9 December)
• RE: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Friday, 6 December)
• RE: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Concepts renumbering? (Monday, 2 December)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Saturday, 21 December)
• reviewing RDF Semantics (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-12-13 (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: semantics doc updated (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Test cases, quick update. (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: datatyping (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: glossary (Wednesday, 4 December)

Mike Dean

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-13 (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 (Monday, 9 December)

pat hayes

• Re: critical typo in semantics doc (Tuesday, 24 December)
• pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax (Friday, 20 December)
• some typos in the semantics doc (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: reviewing RDF Semantics (Thursday, 19 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space (Sunday, 15 December)
• Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...]] (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...] (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Saturday, 14 December)
• Primer 'latest version' link broken? (Friday, 13 December)
• Help with link? (Was: Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions) (Friday, 13 December)
• fig 2 now fixed in semantics doc.... (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: semantics doc updated (Friday, 13 December)
• semantics doc updated (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Wednesday, 11 December)
• semantics clean-up revision (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Bug in MT? (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Bug in MT? (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: 'primary' in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• 'primary' in primer (Monday, 9 December)
• pruning the semantics document (Monday, 9 December)
• handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• rdf:li ?? in primer (Sunday, 8 December)
• Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 (Sunday, 8 December)
• Lbase (Sunday, 8 December)
• trimming fat from semantics doc (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Semantics of rdf:value (Friday, 6 December)
• RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Semantics of rdf:value (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: Using third-party vocabularies (Wednesday, 4 December)
• semantics doc updated for editorial freeze(?) (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: datatyping (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDF primer) (Tuesday, 3 December)
• deletion. (Tuesday, 3 December)
• glossary (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Tuesday, 3 December)
• datatyping (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Quick review of RDF primer (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: Clarifying what datatype entailment support means (Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal) (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: defn of blank nodes and triples RE: Review of 21-Nov concepts draft, part 3, sect 3-end (Sunday, 1 December)

Patrick Stickler

• Review of Concepts Doc (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespaceentailment (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Friday, 13 December)
• Sun Datatypes Library (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Thursday, 12 December)
• Literals as Resources (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: What are literals? (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Question about SHOULD in MT (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: rdf:li ?? in primer (Tuesday, 10 December)
• "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer (Monday, 9 December)
• Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness (Monday, 9 December)
• Question about SHOULD in MT (Monday, 9 December)
• Bug in MT? (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: handling rdf:value (Monday, 9 December)
• RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: call for agenda items (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: semantics doc updated for editorial freeze(?) (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: datatyping (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: Clarifying what datatype entailment support means (Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal) (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: datatype test case (Monday, 2 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 14:03:39 UTC