W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06)

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:48:04 +0200
Message-ID: <00eb01c29f5f$afde0db0$db9316ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "ext pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


> ...Discussion of datatypes schema, where to put it.
> >Suggestion that the schema be moved to a separate document and worked
> >at a different rate outside this WD.
> >
> >[scribe note: I think above might be an action to PatH or an
> >editorial change].
> 
> I think that if it is an action item then it should be on some subset 
> of Patrick, Jeremy and me. A new document presumably needs an editor, 
> right? I could carry this if it is seen as a chore, but since the 
> material is largely Jeremy/Patrick's, it would be more appropriate if 
> it had their names on it.

I think that Jeremy should get primary credit based on his material in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0588.html
would serve as an excellent foundation for such a document, adding
in the RDF Schemas (reflecting different levels of contention/ambiguity)
as appendices to that work, or referenced from that.

And that would serve as good input to the XML Schema WG, perhaps with
the goal of evolving it into a joint Note with a single RDF schema 
reflecting the concensus of the two WGs.

Eh?

Patrick
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 03:48:10 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:49 EDT