W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:13:46 +0000 (GMT)
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0212131413020.5502-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Graham Klyne wrote:

>
> I was trying to check a test case to confirm something in
> Concepts/Semantics docs, and found that:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf
>
> returned an HTTP 403/Forbidden error page.
>
> Also:
>
> re: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.rdf
> The comment is misleading - there is no xml:lang - though the test is OK, I
> think.
>
> Do we have any entailment tests dealing with language-tagged plain literals?
>
> E.g.
>
> 1.
>
>      ex:subject ex:prop "chat" .
> ?entails?
>      ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@fr .
>
> 2.
>
>      ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@en .
> ?entails?
>      ex:subject ex:prop "chat" .
>
> 3.
>
>      ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@en .
> ?entails?
>      ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@fr .
>
> I think the answer is no in each case, and that would be in agreement with
> my readiong of the docs.
> Should these be negative entailment test cases?

For historical reasons (they were done at the same time as the related
DT entailments involving language), see:

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#language-important-for-non-dt-entailment-1

Cheers,
jan

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
You know something's gone badly wrong when your algorithm
takes O(n^2) time but uses O(2^n) space.
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 09:16:27 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:53 EDT