* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2002-12-23 17:08+0000] > > I'm working on the schema doc. I've just removed the statement that the > domain of rdfs:member is rdf:Container on the grounds I couldn't find it in > the MT and I remember us deciding there was no domain for the property (I > think). > > This message is to check that I'm right. You're right. We didn't want :r1 rdf:_1 "blah" to imply that :r1 was a container, since we wanted to allow the _n properties to be used on things that weren't containers. Saying that they are all specializations of a property with a domain of Container woudl mess that up (I assume there's a bit of the MT that fleshes this out). DanReceived on Monday, 23 December 2002 15:03:22 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:58 EDT